16 Oct 2014
GILL V NEW ZEALAND HOME BONDS LIMITED CA358/2014 [2014] NZCA 506
- Citation
- [2014] NZCA 506
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The Court concluded there was no question of law warranting leave because the High Court correctly held the correspondence created a separate collateral agreement between the purchaser and the agent, not terms of the contract with the vendor, and therefore did not negate the contractual position giving rise to NZHBL's claim; accordingly leave was dismissed and costs awarded to the respondent.