22 Apr 2008
The respondent demonstrated the original grant of cover was made in error because there was no evidence that the appellant sustained any physical injury in the 31 October 1996 accident and no causal link could be established between that accident and her chronic regional pain syndrome; therefore revocation under s65(1) was correct and the appeal is dismissed.
10 Oct 2007
The appeal was struck out for want of prosecution because the appellant failed to progress the appeal, did not respond to registry correspondence, and did not attend the hearing, justifying the respondent's strike out application.
14 Sept 2007
The appeal was struck out because the appellant failed to progress the appeal and did not attend the hearing despite notice, and s161(3)(b) authorises striking an appeal for want of prosecution.
16 Jun 2004
The appeal was struck out because the appellant failed to appear at the notified hearing despite being warned that failure to attend could result in strike out, and the respondent's application to strike out for want of prosecution was granted.