17 Feb 2011
VINCENT ROSS SIEMER V MICHAEL PETER STIASSNY CA CA692/2010
- Citation
- openlaw-b5a11b48_9aba_4040_9618_0f3509429518.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The application for recall was declined because it failed to meet the established criteria for recall as it simply sought to re-open issues already considered by the Court and did not demonstrate that the earlier judgment was legally or factually unsafe under the Horowhenua criteria; costs were awarded to the respondents.