10 Nov 2022
HARRY MEMELINK v COLLINS & MAY LAW [2022] NZSC 130
- Citation
- [2022] NZSC 130
- Court
- Supreme Court
The application for an extension of time was dismissed because the applicant did not adequately explain the cumulative delay of over two years since the Court of Appeal decision (and over four years since the High Court adjudication), and, even if delay were excused, no arguable basis for leave to appeal existed under s 74 given the Court of Appeal had properly applied Almond v Read and the proposed appeal lacked merit and public importance and posed no miscarriage risk.