20 Apr 1998
Reihana v Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation
- Citation
- [1998] NZACC 72
- Court
- District Court
The appellant was in temporary/casual engagement via an employment agency and not in "permanent employment" within the meaning of section 40(2A); the ADIA arrangement was agency/placement not direct employment and contemporaneous memoranda demonstrate the Downer placement was temporary, therefore the appellant did not qualify for reassessment of weekly compensation under s40(2A).