28 Nov 2008
MT V DH HC WANG CIV-2008-483-297
- Citation
- openlaw-d91c33c7_edd6_42d7_93f7_3c9332ff5711.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The AVO did not remove the father's parental responsibility or 'rights of custody' under Australian law; the father was exercising or would have exercised those rights and the mother failed to establish a grave risk of harm on return, therefore the duty to order return under the Care of the Children Act applied and the Family Court return order was confirmed.