17 Apr 2018
PAUL GEOFFREY MYALL v TOWER INSURANCE LIMITED [2018] NZSC 35
- Citation
- [2018] NZSC 35
- Court
- Supreme Court
The application for leave was dismissed because the disputed issues were fact‑specific and dependent on the evidence led; despite some reasoning errors below, the conclusions on professional fees and area adjustment were open to the courts and did not raise questions of public or general importance nor demonstrate a miscarriage of justice.