8 Dec 2010
YOUNG V R SC 95/2010
- Citation
- SC 95/2010
- Court
- Supreme Court
The application for leave was dismissed because the evidence (notably the gloves bearing the applicant's DNA) sufficiently supported the jury's verdict, the acquittal of the co-accused was not inconsistent with conviction of the applicant given differing cases, and the judge's summing up was not flawed such as to warrant leave.