11 Dec 2008
P J MCCONNELL AND K F MCCONNELL V FRANKLIN DISTRICT COUNCIL AND ANOR HC AK CIV 2008-404-007903
- Citation
- openlaw-257b0a40_d27f_41cd_8d0d_67501811284b.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The council lawfully declined to publicly notify the application because it properly applied ss93, 94, 94C and s104 of the RMA, considered relevant matters including existing screening, did not err by refusing to speculate about future development or unimplemented consents, and reached a decision a reasonable decision-maker could have reached; consequently the judicial review had little prospect of success and the ex parte restraining order was set aside.