3 Sept 2020
MAWSON v HITCHFIELD [2020] NZHC 2287
- Citation
- [2020] NZHC 2287
- Court
- High Court
The Court found a serious question to be tried on title, trespass and equitable defences but refused the interim mandatory injunction because the balance of convenience and overall justice favoured maintaining the status quo: applicants proceeded with development and incurred substantial holding costs with knowledge of the dispute, reasonable alternatives (amend consent or boundary adjustment) existed, demolition would cause likely irreversible prejudice to respondents, and the applicants' undertaking as to damages lacked sufficient backing.