22 Aug 2007
GATEHOUSE V MIDDLETON AND ANOR HC HAM CIV 2006-419-808
- Citation
- openlaw-6a0a6d92_fd2c_4487_8acb_2253c94af966.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Leave to appeal was declined because the High Court correctly applied orthodox principles in implying the contractual term (business efficacy/obvious intention), clause 88 was properly interpreted as not excluding implied terms, and the issues did not raise sufficient public or private importance to outweigh the cost and delay of a further appeal.