12 Oct 2010
SARATH V MINISTER OF IMMIGRATION AND ORS HC AK CIV 2010-404-006709
- Citation
- openlaw-0dd15e81_87bf_4a5e_a023_c9b0fa15cf58.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The interim application was dismissed because the applicant did not demonstrate a respectable chance of success on the substantive judicial review claims; the immigration officer acted within the discretionary framework of s58 (as amended), reasonably questioned the applicant about family and funds, any challenge to the IRD seizure is a separate remedy and does not justify a stay, and a stay would improperly facilitate continued breach of immigration obligations.