1 Jun 2012
ROBINSON v BUDGET LOANS LIMITED HC WN CIV 2011-485-002527
- Citation
- openlaw-5797b96a_baf1_49e2_b54f_8ee7d0852b6c.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Section 28(2)(a)(i) excludes amounts payable solely by reason of acceleration from the reinstatement sum; although Budget's notices incorrectly included accelerated balances and used value ranges, the errors were not deliberate, the appellant (through counsel) knew of his rights and was not materially misled, and therefore the notices were not void; range estimates are acceptable if the creditor would accept the bottom of the range; no adequate evidence supported findings of oppressive conduct or unreasonable fees.