23 May 2017
KI COMMERCIAL LIMITED v CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL [2017] NZHC 1076
- Citation
- [2017] NZHC 1076
- Court
- High Court
The appeal is dismissed: the High Court held the Panel did not err in law because it properly construed its remit, considered the relevant statutory context and s32/s32AA matters, reasonably assessed precedent and CBD risk on evidential grounds, lawfully required and relied on Council evidence and refused an adjournment within the constrained timetable, and correctly interpreted "existing" in the Plan objectives as at the date of the Panel decision.