16 May 2012
SHARMA V WATI COA CA33/2012
- Citation
- openlaw-f85b6589_294e_4eb4_8e6e_8de820090c7a.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
Hansen J properly reviewed the Associate Judge's decision because it was dealt with in chambers under the High Court Rules and the Judicature Act; defects in the bankruptcy notices were cured by s418 of the Insolvency Act absent prejudice; the substantive grounds to set aside the bankruptcy notices lacked merit; the delay, applicant conduct and prejudice to respondent precluded any extension of time to appeal; accordingly special leave to appeal was refused and costs awarded to respondent.