3 Sept 2007
NOBLE, ARNOTT, VENNER, GILES AND JONES V HOLDEN HC PMN CIV-2005-454-677
- Citation
- openlaw-1b0e47bb_51d3_4a51_a726_874ac607e8b4.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The limited grant to Mr Holden had expired and the chain of representation was not preserved such that s13 did not entitle him (and Mr Stewart) to probate in the original estate; given continuing hostility and special circumstances it was necessary and expedient under s6(2) to grant letters of administration to residuary beneficiary Carol Mavis Venner to ensure expeditious, low‑cost administration; extension of the limited probate was refused and the committal and removal applications were unnecessary or dismissed.