18 Dec 2019
NASEEB v COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE [2019] NZHC 3382
- Citation
- [2019] NZHC 3382
- Court
- High Court
There was no error in the District Court's conclusion that neither change of counsel nor receipt of the Deloitte report constituted a fundamental change in circumstances under s51(2) CPA or a proximate link to the election decision; accordingly no question of law arose and the District Court's refusal to grant leave to change the election was upheld.