21 Jan 2009
Saul v Accident Compensation Corporation
- Citation
- [2009] NZACC 5
- Court
- District Court
The assessor's report was a marginal but legally flawed administrative decision because it omitted to state the assessor's opinion and reasons on a central contested medical question (whether pain and fatigue preclude full‑time work), a matter that falls within clause 29(1)(c); that omission rendered the vocational independence medical assessment insufficiently transparent and thus set aside.