29 Feb 2016
M v Accident Compensation Corporation
- Citation
- [2016] NZACC 52
- Court
- District Court
Leave to appeal was refused because no reasonably arguable question of law arose: the District Court correctly interpreted s28(1)(a) as not covering ordinary commuting once the worker had left the place of employment, found as a fact the applicant had finished his shift and was commuting, and the applicant's submissions merely recharacterised factual findings rather than identifying an error of law.