28 Jul 2020
YU v BRADLEY [2020] NZHC 1822
- Citation
- (2020) 21 NZCPC 220
- Court
- High Court
On the facts the initial misrepresentation about the boundary was corrected before the purchaser entered the contract so misrepresentation did not induce the contract; the purchaser had a contractual right to inspect but failed to authorise the valuer in writing under cl 3.2 while the vendor's communication prevented inspection in a way the purchaser reasonably perceived; the purchaser did not validly serve an unconditional cl 8 claim in respect of the boundary by the required time so was not entitled to withhold settlement after inspection; the purchaser's purported cancellation was ineffect…