23 Mar 2022
A (CA83/2020) v R [2022] NZCA 72
- Citation
- [2022] NZCA 72
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The Court declined leave to adduce the proposed fresh evidence: the Vaseline evidence, although treated as fresh and credible, was not cogent because the seized jar was properly regarded as contextual corroboration of lubricant in the garage rather than the exact item used in the offending and therefore would not have led to a not guilty verdict; the brother's affidavit was not fresh, was temporally irrelevant to the 2016–2017 offending period and, even at its highest, could not contradict trial evidence that the appellant controlled computer access and could use the computer via passwords or…