26 Jun 2019
HARDING v R [2019] NZCA 259
- Citation
- [2019] NZCA 259
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The appeal was dismissed because the Judge correctly found the appellant had received comprehensive and repeated legal advice, understood the elements and consequences of the manufacturing charges, there was no improper pressure or disqualifying conflict by counsel, the Crown case was strong that methamphetamine (not merely ephedrine) was manufactured, and no miscarriage of justice would result from upholding the guilty pleas.