29 Aug 2017
COMPLAINANT A v NEW ZEALAND LAW SOCIETY [2017] NZCA 373
- Citation
- [2017] NZCA 373
- Court
- Court of Appeal
Dispensation of security for costs was declined because the appellant had effectively consented to the suppression order as evidenced by his prior communications, making the appeal unlikely to succeed; a practical alternative remedy in the High Court existed given the original order was made without full argument; and a subsequent High Court judgment further reduced any prospect that a solvent appellant would continue, therefore dispensation was not necessary to preserve access.