29 Jun 2016
NAND v TOWER INSURANCE [2016] NZHC 1455
- Citation
- [2016] NZHC 1455
- Court
- High Court
Summary judgment was dismissed because the defendant relied on inadmissible or insufficient hearsay to establish causation and exclusions; the policy's definition of "you" did not, on its wording and context, extend to deprive the named insureds of cover due to the alleged acts of their uninsured adult son; and material factual issues about fire cause and applicability of exclusions/warranty made summary disposal inappropriate.