15 Mar 2006
OODIAN (AUCKLAND CITY) LIMITED V COLWALL PROPERTY INVESTMENT LIMITED HC AK CIV 2005-404-002061
- Citation
- openlaw-93f47415_8670_4459_b1d5_8cf4f61a7bc9.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Court found a binding equitable agreement to lease existed but the defendant did not breach or misrepresent the trading hours; the plaintiff failed to prove loss and in any event trading hours were not an essential term entitling termination. Accordingly plaintiff's claims failed and defendant was entitled to its quantified counterclaim; judgment entered for defendant in the sum of $272,554.51.