1 May 2012
LIPP V CHANEY HC AK CIV-2011-404-008091
- Citation
- openlaw-84d8ec48_0a1a_4579_b5ae_a54dd9b04aa8.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The application for a stay was dismissed because the Chaneys' undertaking to cooperate to have related appeals determined together on the allocated hearing date and not to enforce any costs award until that hearing removed any meaningful prejudice to the Lipps; delivering the final award therefore enabled efficient consolidation and avoided additional expense.