28 Apr 2005
King v Accident Compensation Corporation and another
- Citation
- [2005] NZACC 135
- Court
- District Court
Appellant failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the particular property or characteristic of his employment caused or materially contributed to his osteolysis to the extent required by s30(2) because credible medical evidence established a strong association between the condition and non-employment weightlifting and the appellant did not exclude gym weightlifting as a substantial cause; therefore s30 is not satisfied and cover is not available.