7 Jul 2009
JL MARTIN AND ORS V RJ BURNSIDE AND ANOR HC NAP CIV 2009-441-230
- Citation
- openlaw-170bd71e_a77d_486f_8941_11b4f3dfd5cb.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Plaintiffs demonstrated there was no reasonably arguable defence: the $450,000 dividend fund must be distributed in accordance with the Will as amended by the Deed (less reasonable estate solicitor administration costs), and the Thistle Paddock and associated water easement must be transferred/created for the transferees; the first defendant's demand for an indemnity/release protecting his separate role as director was improper and did not justify withholding distributions or refusal of summary judgment.