30 Apr 2018
TAO v STRATA TITLE ADMINISTRATION LTD & ORS [2018] NZHC 848
- Citation
- [2018] NZHC 848
- Court
- High Court
The application to set aside the bankruptcy notice was dismissed because all statutory requirements in s17 of the Insolvency Act 2006 were satisfied: there was a final judgment and unpaid costs, no qualifying cross claim existed (the Human Rights claim was for amounts less than the judgment debt and the District Court claim was struck out), no applicable indemnity covered the applicant for these costs, the insurer had declined cover, and service of the sealed judgment and bankruptcy notice was lawful.