12 Jul 2007
SIEMER V STIASSNY AND ANOR SC 26/2007
- Citation
- SC 26/2007
- Court
- Supreme Court
The application for leave was dismissed because no arguable question of law or question of public or general importance arose: the contempt findings were supported by direct evidence, the interlocutory procedure and affidavit/cross-examination decisions were orthodox and discretionary, allegations of bias and hearsay objections lacked merit, and the costs award did not disclose an error of principle warranting a second appeal.