10 Jun 2016
Mike Pero (New Zealand) Limited v Krishna [2016] NZHC 1255
- Citation
- (2016) 14 NZELR 244
- Court
- High Court
The court held that (1) r8.32 did not apply to the originating/interim applications and the r8.32 notices were not enforceable in this context; (2) the four late 'reply' affidavits alleging database manipulation were inadmissible because they were not strictly in reply; (3) no special circumstances justified cross-examination of Mr Krishna; (4) originating interim orders made under the Arbitration Act are not interlocutory and therefore cannot be varied or rescinded under the usual interlocutory review rule but must be challenged by appeal; and (5) on the merits the LinkedIn and PAA entries d…