18 Aug 2022
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS v KEPU [2022] NZHC 2044
- Citation
- [2022] NZHC 2044
- Court
- High Court
Respondent has a pervasive pattern of serious violent offending and meets the s 107IAA criteria demonstrating a very high risk of committing a relevant violent offence; strong justification exists for an ESO; a five year Extended Supervision Order is the minimum period required for community safety; special conditions are to be set by the Parole Board; the Court lacks jurisdiction to cancel or vary an electronic monitoring interim condition imposed previously on an ISO (challenge should proceed to the Parole Board), but the Court may impose a limited interim curfew pending Board determination.