6 Mar 2014
AHIPARA DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED v HAPE & ANOR [2014] NZHC 384
- Citation
- [2014] NZHC 384
- Court
- High Court
The prior substituted service order did not automatically extend to the new applications for varied orders/damages and, given the passage of time and potential loss of nexus between the defendants and their former solicitor, the plaintiff must apply for fresh substituted service; the matter is therefore adjourned to permit those applications.