7 Dec 2010
I A K V S A G HC WN CIV-2010-485-1694
- Citation
- openlaw-47442fc0_9a4b_451b_81db_5e1ee822bf50.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The High Court held the Family Court was correct to treat the RSU issues as res judicata: the 2007 and 2008 awards were post‑separation and therefore not relationship property, and the appellant should have raised valuation and vesting issues at the original hearing or on appeal; the attempt to reopen the matters was inappropriate and the appeal is dismissed.