11 Feb 2011
SCOTT V MILLER HC GIS civ 2009-416-236
- Citation
- openlaw-bfab84ab_265c_4e08_b6b5_f3db58347aaf.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Although the non‑paternity application was a collateral challenge to an extant 1990 High Court paternity declaration and had little prospect of success, the court would not find on the evidence that the applicant had acted vexatiously or very unreasonably to justify indemnity costs; however the applicant had pursued an argument with little prospect of success over 18 months and an uplift of 50% to standard 2B costs was justified under High Court Rules r14.6(3).