14 Jul 2014
The Supreme Court declined the application for review because the course proposed by Glazebrook J—that the applicant apply for recall of the Court of Appeal judgment—was sensible and likely the most expeditious way to resolve the underlying dispute over whether the appeal had been deemed abandoned, making the adjournment appropriate.
14 Nov 2013
Leave to appeal was dismissed because there was no underlying appeal after ordered security for costs was not paid and the Registrar and Harrison J correctly applied established legal principles in refusing to dispense with security for costs; no substantial miscarriage of justice was demonstrated.
20 Jun 2012
The extension was declined because the appellant failed to remedy a defective notice of appeal (leading to deemed abandonment under r 30(3)), did not pay ordered security, offered no satisfactory explanation for delay, the proposed appeal had no real prospect of success as it challenged findings of fact, and the appellant's bankruptcy and the Official Assignee's disclaimer prevented him from pursuing the appeal.
28 Mar 2012
Both applications were struck out: CA632/2008 was duplicative because leave to appeal on the same issue had already been granted; CA666/2011 was moot following this Court's decision quashing the Tribunal's costs order and the related High Court costs award. Applicants ordered to pay Crown costs for a standard application on band A plus usual disbursements.