17 Sept 2010
B V D HC AK CIV-2010-404-002861
- Citation
- openlaw-00c8cbb0_ce12_4d37_85a3_370bef217d42.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The Court refused leave to adduce the appellant's affidavit about lack of representation and the bank letters because there was no adequate foundation, the evidence was not fresh and the financial statements already in evidence addressed the same matters; refused leave for Barnes' anecdotal employability evidence as not fresh or probative; granted limited leave to adduce expert accounting evidence from Mr Meltzer on unresolved issues after the accountants conferred, with filing deadlines and rights of reply and cross-examination, because accounting evidence was central and appellant lacked th…