15 Apr 2014
PARK LANE ESTATES LIMITED v SUNG-HYUN KIM and TAE-HAN KIM and GAE JA LEE and SANG MI HONG [2014] NZHC 782
- Citation
- (2014) 15 NZCPR 155
- Court
- High Court
The caveat was removed because it failed to comply with s137(2)(c) of the Land Transfer Act 1952 by not sufficiently stating how Park Lane's claimed interest was derived from the registered proprietors; Park Lane did not establish any assignment and did not pursue the oral assignment argument, so the caveat could not be maintained and the application to sustain it was dismissed.