5 Feb 2009
T M PURU V J T PURU AND ANOR HC AK CIV 2007-404-003881
- Citation
- openlaw-593dda48_6ee8_4562_a12d_bab195982474.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The court held that no order for costs should be made against the first defendant because she was legally aided under s 40(2), but pursuant to s 40(5) the court would specify that, had s 40(2) not applied, costs would have been awarded to the plaintiff on a category 2B basis in CIV 2006-404-001841, CIV 2006-404-002491 and CIV 2007-404-003881, together with reasonable disbursements and expenses, and leave was reserved to address any implementation difficulties.