17 Apr 2007
ANDREW NICHOLAS HOLDGATE V BLOCASSA LIMITED AND ANOR CA CA131/06
- Citation
- openlaw-8970ef24_22f9_4ee5_8b8c_994381bed8f2.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The annulment was properly refused because the appellant failed to provide verifiable evidence of sufficient liquid assets or a realistic, prompt means to realise property to meet debts at the time of adjudication; the court was entitled to disregard unsubstantiated asset claims given non‑cooperation with the Official Assignee, and the exercise of discretion to dismiss the annulment application was not plainly wrong.