23 Aug 2006
HAINES V WAIKATO DISTRICT LAW SOCIETY HC HAM CIV-2006-419-426
- Citation
- openlaw-7fbeaec8_1070_4387_a5f6_de4d19570964.pdf
- Court
- High Court
On the material before the Court the applicant demonstrated convincing evidence of rehabilitation and current good character (supporting affidavits, employment history, academic and professional conduct), the offending was historical, he was not the architect of the fraud and was influenced by others, and the District Law Society declined to oppose the application; therefore the Court was satisfied the applicant is of good character and a fit and proper person to be admitted and dispensed with the r6(2) certificate requirement under its discretion.