7 Dec 2005
COROMANDEL WATCHDOG OF HAURAKI INCORPORATED V CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE MINISTRY OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND ANOR HC AK CIV 2004-485-1838
- Citation
- openlaw-30147d6e_a6d9_42eb_b7af_28237f5b1478.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Leave to appeal was declined because the proposed question was insufficiently framed for s144 purposes, the issue was not shown to be of sufficient public or general importance given the council's non-involvement and absence of evidence of wider impact, and the applicant's position was not capable of serious argument in light of prior Environment Court and High Court findings limiting use of prohibited activity status to activities that should in no circumstances be allowed during the life of the plan.