14 Dec 2010
HALL V ROBINSON AND ANOR HC CHCH CIV-2010-409-001378
- Citation
- openlaw-94c06cfa_3b2e_4cb5_9596_d3983caf5f95.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Summary judgment was dismissed because there are genuine contested factual issues (including whether the second defendant received funds or signed the acknowledgement under pressure) that require cross‑examination and because the 13 August acknowledgement does not conclusively estop the second defendant or itself create a cause of action linking her to the advances.