21 Sept 2004
WEST V OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE And Anor CA CA144/03
- Citation
- openlaw-70085ba2_4236_44df_812c_f9b0e47b7d65.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The Court dismissed the appellant's approach for lack of jurisdiction and affirmed Heath J's conclusion that the claim against the Department disclosed no viable cause of action because court officers had no duty to give legal advice or to remedy defective filings and no loss resulted from any registry delay as the substantive vesting order was upheld.