18 Jul 2016
HEENAN v ALSTON [2016] NZHC 1613
- Citation
- [2016] NZHC 1613
- Court
- High Court
The s119 application to vest disclaimed rights was denied because vesting would be unfair and oppressive to the respondent given the prior High Court finding that the applicant had no prima facie relationship property claim, the applicant's bankruptcy arose from unpaid costs to that respondent, the applicant's status as a vexatious litigant, his non‑compliant and scandalous pleadings, and the risk that the respondent could not obtain security for costs; leave under s88B was denied for identical reasons and because the proposed proceedings were frivolous, scandalous and not in compliance with…