17 Nov 2009
SOLICITOR-GENERAL OF NEW ZEALAND V HUANG HC AK CIV 2009-404-2532
- Citation
- openlaw-c793cafc_e012_4760_a15a_65a580df2b5e.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Where assessed benefits exceed value of forfeited property but there is no evidence the offender has other assets and where imposition would be futile or unenforceable (eg due to probable deportation and inability to pay), the court will in exercise of its s25 discretion decline to make pecuniary penalty orders but may reserve leave to reapply if additional assets are discovered.