27 Mar 2017
The leave application was dismissed because the applicant failed to demonstrate a proper evidential foundation for removing opposing counsel, the threshold for removal was not met, any additional evidence was likely privileged, and the application did not raise an arguable point of public or general importance nor a risk of substantial miscarriage of justice.
18 Jun 2014
Summary judgment was correctly granted because BBC's contemporaneous documents and evidence showed there was no real defence to the portion of the claim pursued; Topagri's asserted defences (expenses, spare parts, pricing disputes, payment allocations) and its counterclaim/set‑off were unsupported by adequate evidential foundation or were implausible, and appropriation of payments favoured BBC absent contrary evidence.
6 Jun 2006
SC 21/2006
18 Jun 2003
The respondent failed to establish any evidential foundation for the alleged agency, oral condition or indemnity and provided no factual basis for the Takeovers Code defence; therefore no genuine triable issue existed and summary judgment for the appellant for the sum due under the put option was appropriate.