16 Jul 2008
THE SOLICITOR GENERAL V GRAY HC AK CIV 2006-404-675
- Citation
- openlaw-707d017c_039d_4444_81c7_bebc0d0c0522.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The judge accepted the respondent's motorcycle sale but found on the evidence and reasonable inference (including forensic accountant's unexplained income) that the $25,000 was more likely than not proceeds of cannabis sales between August and November 2004 and ordered forfeiture of the $25,000; declined to impose a pecuniary penalty because evidence was insufficient to assess benefits beyond the forfeited sum; allowed payment of the respondent's counsel fees and disbursements of $15,446.45 from the restrained fund as reasonable.