11 Aug 2016
The recall application is dismissed because the applicant failed to provide current, specific financial evidence demonstrating impecuniosity or full accounts; the material cited did not rectify that failure and there was no "very special reason" to recall the judgment under Horowhenua County v Nash (No 2).
25 Jul 2008
ACC lawfully applied the applicable transport regulations and is not required to pay further amounts because the appellant failed to prove actual taxi costs, the 1992/1999 regulations limit reimbursement to public transport or per-kilometre rates, and the 2002 regulations require prior approval and necessity for actual taxi fares which were not established.
13 Jul 2001
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to produce contemporaneous supporting medical evidence confirming the dates, occurrence and consistency of the alleged accidents and injuries; mere recitation of falls without medical confirmation does not meet the Act's requirements for cover.
24 Oct 1996
The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to produce expert medical evidence demonstrating medical error or a causal link between the treatment and alleged injuries; the medical misadventure committee and Review Officer findings that treatment was appropriate and informed consent occurred stand unrefuted, so no compensable personal injury was established.