2 Mar 2007
TINY INTELLIGENCE LIMITED AND ANOR V RESPORT LIMITED HC CHCH CIV-2003-409-000352
- Citation
- openlaw-ccdf7818_6a09_40c8_9fae_a83d7ba22eee.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The court concluded that although issuing a statutory demand before sealing was not strictly illegal, it was inadvisable and logically inconsistent with the scheme of the Rules because a debt should be treated as due only after sealing; consequently the pre-emptive action could not justify awarding costs to the plaintiff and the recall application to re-litigate costs was refused.